World List Breast Size By Nationality

NUCLEAR? NO! THANKS

know history is full of more or less serious accidents in nuclear power plants, just remember what happened on April 26, 1986 at Chernobyl in Ukraine, and unfortunately there will be more in the future. My vision is not catastrophic, is the simple awareness of the decadent structural situation of existing installations and of danger involved in handling nuclear energy. Just think of the enormous energy that comes from nuclear fission (that energy contained in the infinitely small), and the radiation produced physically in the form of waste, and comply with the increasingly dilapidated structures of power that should manage and contain it all to realize that one can never be sure .

Safety - for employees in the central and the local community - in the nuclear field does not exist, and can not exist! All we say industry experts are simply nonsense to convince the beautiful and good people. We feel that since Italy is one of the few European countries without nuclear power (through the referendum of 1987) we are dependent on foreign, and, because we are surrounded by many plants (only in France there are 59), our security is almost ridiculous, so might as well open central!

's all true, both the energy dependence that the risk of explosion on the border stations, but are certainly some valid reasons to plunge headlong into nuclear power. You do not find these explanations demented and especially in bad faith?

The rhetorical question is always the same: because they are not invested money in research, serious ones, to find new energies that are not harmful and polluting such as oil and dangerously radioactive as a nuclear power? I refer to wind, solar, geothermal to, hydrogen and thereby to cold fusion, etc..

Open a nuclear power plant, or reactivate an abandoned for years, are not trifles: serving tens of billions of euro, not counting the cost of maintaining them (the security systems and the cost to cool a crazy year!). All this money, stolen from us consumers, it will be for our welfare, despite the regime's propaganda, but always just end up in the coffers of big energy companies. If they were really for our 'well-being, "should be towards an energy system that does not pollute, that respects the environment in which we live. So to ourselves! The Earth is in fact a living system itself, is the same as our Casa Grande and the Great Mother.

Nuclear, fossil fuels (oil, gas) and anything else these scoundrels are proposing no conscience and we will propose in the very near future, can not be for the benefit of the individual simply that they both made the final result, as contraindications, pollution scary for the entire ecosystem. Nuclear power produces nuclear waste for example not be disposed of (if not thousands of years) that will be buried in the depths of the oceans and / or seas or under millions of cubic meters of concrete, not to mention the risk accidents, but the fossil will continue undaunted to increase the harmful greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. I remember the most eminent climate scientists worldwide have warned the owners of the land to save the planet is necessary to reduce current emissions by 80%! Do not reduce to 5%, as proposed by the Kyoto Protocol (ditched by George Walker Bush), but even 80 percent!

As in the case of the disease, it is useful to listen and interpret the signs (symptoms) that the body, in this case the planet is giving us. In this context, the ' accident 'at the Mihama Nuclear Power Station - 59mo occurred exactly in the year of the massacre - is a clear indication (from above) that nuclear power as an energy source, and by extension, the same intrinsic energy of the atom (which can result in 'weapon of mass destruction more criminal in the world: the atomic bomb), is deeply wrong!

people meditate, meditate ...